
Five financial traders could have their convictions for manipulating the Libor interest rate benchmarks overturned following a landmark UK Supreme Court ruling, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) said Friday.
Britain’s highest court in July quashed the convictions of former traders Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that errors in the way the jury had been directed rendered the convictions ‘unsafe’.
‘The jury directions... which were the basis of the court’s judgment, may apply to Jonathan Mathew, Jay Merchant, Alex Pabon, Philippe Moryoussef and Colin Bermingham’s trials,’ the SFO said on its website.
‘Therefore, their convictions may be considered unsafe,’ it added.
Manipulation of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (Libor) and its euro equivalent Euribor occurred in the run-up to and following the 2008 global financial crisis.
The international scandal it created led to prison sentences and massive fines for major banks.
‘We have already lodged applications... to have their cases referred back to the Court of Appeal,’ Ben Rose of law firm Hickman and Rose, which represents three of the cases, said in a statement sent to AFP.
However, the SFO considered the conviction of another former trader, Peter Johnson, who had pleaded guilty, ‘to be sound’.
The Libor was long a benchmark inter-bank rate in the financial world, impacting an enormous range of financial products in Britain and beyond, before being abolished at the end of last year following numerous scandals.
In a landmark case last month, the Supreme Court quashed the conviction of Hayes, a former Citigroup and UBS trader, who had been found guilty of multiple counts of conspiracy to defraud Libor between 2006 and 2010.
He spent five-and-a-half years in prison before his release in January 2021.
The Supreme Court noted that there was ‘ample evidence’ against Hayes which could have led a jury to find him guilty ‘if properly directed’.
The SFO, which brought the original case against Hayes and Palombo, said it would not seek a retrial.