FOR over four decades, microfinance has been hailed as a revolutionary tool for poverty alleviation. From the villages of Bangladesh to the favelas of Latin America, it promised to transform the unbanked into entrepreneurs and empower women through credit. Yet, as the model has evolved, its soul has been compromised. What began as a humanitarian effort to enable self-reliance has too often turned into a commercialised machine that mimics the very financial systems it once sought to reform. The model that once inspired hope now raises questions about ethics, inclusivity and sustainability.
It is within this context that soft microfinance emerges. It is a call to return to the human essence of finance, one that measures success not by repayment rates or portfolio growth, but by restored dignity and genuine empowerment.
听
The philosophy behind soft microfinance
SOFT microfinance rests on a simple but radical belief: finance should serve people, not the other way around. It aims to balance financial discipline with compassion, focusing on ethical lending, flexibility and holistic support.
Unlike conventional microfinance institutions that charge very high interest rates and prioritise financial sustainability above all else, soft microfinance operates on single-digit variable service fee 鈥� zero to maximum of 8 per cent 鈥� based strictly on actual annual audited costs. Any surplus is either refunded to borrowers or donated to its social development programmes. This model ensures transparency and mutual trust, values that have long been eroded in mainstream microfinance. Soft microfinance goes beyond numbers. It integrates non-financial services such as healthcare, education, training and mentoring, recognising that poverty is multidimensional and cannot be solved through credit alone. It is not just about lending money but enabling life where borrowers are not just clients rather, they are partners in progress.
听
Reaching the most excluded
TRADITIONAL microfinance has increasingly shifted towards the 鈥榮afe poor鈥�, those who are poor enough to qualify for microloans but not too poor to default. The ultra-poor, people with disabilities, single mothers and remote indigenous communities are often left out. For them, soft microfinance provides a bridge.
By waiving or subsidising service fees in cases of extreme poverty and coupling financial aid with social support, it opens the door for those whom market-driven microfinance has excluded. It also invests in productive assets so that recipients have tangible means to generate income before being burdened by repayment obligations.
听
Transparency and trust
A CORE weakness of conventional microfinance has been opacity 鈥� hidden fees, forced savings and interest compounding under various labels. Soft microfinance adopts a transparent accounting framework that openly discloses operational costs, service fees, no compound rate, and use of surpluses. By committing to annual third-party audits and community oversight, it reinforces accountability. When borrowers understand where their money goes, their participation deepens, repayment rates improve and the relationship between institution and community transforms from transactional to cooperative.
听
Global relevance and replicability
WHILE soft microfinance was conceptualised in Bangladesh, its principles held universal value. Across Africa, Latin America, and even marginalised urban communities in developed nations, there is growing disappointment with profit-cantered microfinance. The same model that promised empowerment has, in many cases, commodified poverty.
The world stands at a crossroads. The global south faces widening inequality, climate vulnerability and social exclusion 鈥� all of which amplify the fragility of the poor. In such times, traditional microfinance, with its focus on credit expansion rather than empowerment, feels increasingly outdated. Soft microfinance calls for a paradigm shift from finance as an instrument of debt to finance as an instrument of dignity. It invites practitioners, donors and policymakers to reimagine the metrics of success. Instead of counting the financial return on investment, we should ask: how many lives improved?
听
The challenge of sustainability
CRITICS might argue that softening the financial model could compromise sustainability. However, experience shows that financial sustainability and social justice are not mutually exclusive. When borrowers are treated with respect, given mutually agreed time to grow and supported holistically, default rates drop and repayment becomes a matter of pride rather than fear. Partnerships with philanthropic foundations, social investors and ethical corporations can supplement operational funding in the early phases. Over time, as trust builds, the model can become largely self-sustaining through disciplined yet humane practices.
听
Not to profit from poverty
IN THE end, soft microfinance is not merely a financial model; it is a moral proposition. It proposes a new social contract between lenders and the poor 鈥� one based on trust, empathy and shared growth. If we truly believe that poverty is not a moral failure but a structural one, then our financial systems must reflect that belief. By softening the rigid edges of finance, we may finally rediscover the purpose of microfinance: not to profit from poverty, but to end it.
听
ATM Ridwanul Haque is a development activist.
